Tools

Add a finding for this diagnosis

Add prevalence for this diagnosis

Switch to calculator mode to see positive predictive value

Switch to sensitivity and specificity

Sort findings by Tag

Sort findings by Differential Diagnosis

Jump To

Good Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratios

Poorly Diagnostic Findings

Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Likelihood Ratios

Introduction: None written.

[Edit Diagnosis] [Merge dx] [Add prevalence]

Tags: Ear Nose and Throat Neurologic Tag this Diagnosis.

Differential Diagnoses include: Conductive Hearing Loss

The likelihood ratios of findings for Sensorineural Hearing Loss are listed below. See the left navigation bar to change the display.

Good Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratios

13.8

0.5

air conduction > bone conduction implies sensorineural hearing loss (or normal ear)

512Hz tuning fork. [Calculated from +LR 15, -LR 0.47.]

Differential Diagnosis: Conductive Hearing Loss

Study: JAMA. 2006;295:416-428. and Johnston DF. "A new modification of the Rinne test." Clin Otolaryngol. 1992;17:322-326.

Poorly Diagnostic Findings

1.9

0.6

tuning fork in the middle of the head - conductive hearing loss will make that ear louder, whereas sensorineural hearing loss will make the ear quieter

256Hz tuning fork

Differential Diagnosis: Conductive Hearing Loss

Study: NEUROLOGY 2007;69:1382 PMID: 17893301