Tools

Add a finding for this diagnosis

Add prevalence for this diagnosis

Switch to display mode

Switch to sensitivity and specificity

Sort findings by Tag

Sort findings by Differential Diagnosis

Jump To

Good Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratios

Good Negative Likelihood Ratio

Good Positive Likelihood Ratio

Poorly Diagnostic Findings

Findings With Unspecified Accuracy

Colon Cancer: Likelihood Ratios

Introduction: None written.

[Edit Diagnosis] [Merge dx] [Add prevalence]

Tags: Gastrointestinal Problem Neoplasm Tag this Diagnosis.

Prevalence

Population / Calculator	Prevalence	Comments / Study / Link
	5%
More, Edit...

The likelihood ratios of findings for Colon Cancer are listed below. See the left navigation bar to change the display.

Pre-Test Probability (Prevalence): %.	Post-Test Probability (Predictive Value): %.	Switch to display mode.
Note that calculating probabilities from more than one** finding is inherently inaccurate because findings are not independent. (For example, using two positive findings that share a common pathogenesis is likely to overestimate the true probability.)

Good Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratios
Finding	Result	+LR	-LR
[ + ] Colonoscopy	+ 0 -	6.8	0.1
Sensitivity differs for adenoma size (<5 mm 75%, 6-9mm 85%, >10mm 95%). Study: USPSTF Modeling Report https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/modeling-report1/colorectal-cancer-screening
[ + ] Fecal Occult Blood	+ 0 -	5.9	0.1
immunoassay-based test (note the very high sensitivity here) this was only in secondary referral clinics (probable bias?) Study: BMJ. 2010 Mar 31;340:c1269 PMID: 20360221
[ + ] Fecal Occult Blood	+ 0 -	5.4	0.3
guaiac-based test (note much higher sensitivity here compared to other studies) Study: BMJ. 2010 Mar 31;340:c1269 PMID: 20360221

Good Negative Likelihood Ratio
Finding	Result	+LR	-LR
[ + ] Secondary Screening Referral Guideline	+ 0 -	1.6	0.2
At least one of the following: Rectal bleeding with a change in bowel habit to looser stools and/or increased frequency of defecation persistent for 6 weeks. Age threshold: all ages. Change in bowel habit as above without rectal bleeding and persistent for 6 weeks. Age threshold: over 60 years. Rectal bleeding persistently without anal symptoms. Age threshold: over 60 years. A definite palpable right-sided abdominal mass. Age threshold: all ages. A definite palpable rectal mass (not pelvic). Age threshold: all ages. Unexplained iron deficiency anaemia. In men: below 11g/dl, all ages. In women: below 10 g/dl, post menopausal. Study:* BMJ. 2010 Mar 31;340:c1269 PMID: 20360221
[ + ] Age	+ 0 -	1.8	0.3
Age > 60 Study: BMJ. 2010 Mar 31;340:c1269 PMID: 20360221
[ + ] Age	+ 0 -	1.4	0.3
Age > 50 Study: BMJ. 2010 Mar 31;340:c1269 PMID: 20360221

Good Positive Likelihood Ratio
Finding	Result	+LR	-LR
[ + ] Fecal Occult Blood	+ 0 -	4	0.8
6-sample Study: Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jan 18;142(2):81-5. PMID: 15657155
[ + ] Age	+ 0 -	2.4	0.6
Age > 70 Study: BMJ. 2010 Mar 31;340:c1269 PMID: 20360221
[ + ] Rectal Mass	+ 0 -	2.3	0.8
note that sens for abdominal mass = 4% Study: BMJ. 2010 Mar 31;340:c1269 PMID: 20360221

Findings With Unspecified Accuracy
Finding	Result	+LR	-LR
[ + ] S. Bovis bacteremia		No accuracy specified.
Aside from colon cancer, other GI pathology, liver disease and HIV should be considered. Study: PMID: 16614996 Alazmi W; Bustamante M; O'loughlin C; Gonzalez J; Raskin JB Dig Dis Sci. 2006 Apr;51(4):732-6.
[ + ] CEA		No accuracy specified.
Carcinoembryonic antigen Study: no study specified.