Aortic Stenosis: Likelihood Ratios

Introduction: None written.

The likelihood ratios of findings for Aortic Stenosis are listed below. See the left navigation bar to change the display.

Good Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratios

Finding	+LR	-LR	Comments, Study
Brachioradial Delay	6.7	0	Study: JAMA. 1997;277(7):564-571. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/277/7/564
Murmur	2.4	0	i.e. presence of any murmur Study: JAMA. 1997;277(7):564-571. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/277/7/564
Pulsus Tardus Duplicate	2.8	0.2	Study: JAMA. 1997;277(7):564-571. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/277/7/564
S4	2.5	0.3	Study: JAMA. 1997;277(7):564-571. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/277/7/564
Late-Peaking Systolic Murmur	69	0.3	Study: JAMA. 1997;277(7):564-571. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/277/7/564
Decreased S2 Duplicate	3.1	0.4	Study: JAMA. 1997;277(7):564-571. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/277/7/564
Decreased S2 Duplicate	56	0.4	Study: JAMA. 1997;277(7):564-571. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/277/7/564

Good Negative Likelihood Ratio

1.2

Study: JAMA. 1997;277(7):564-571. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/277/7/564

1.4

0.1

Study: JAMA. 1997;277(7):564-571. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/277/7/564

Good Positive Likelihood Ratio

inf

0.6

slow rise of carotid pulse.

Other studies in the meta-analysis gave +LR 2.8 -LR 0.18, 6.4 and .73. This study had grade "A" quality.

Study: JAMA. 1997;277(7):564-571. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/277/7/564