GetTheDiagnosis.org

Welcome, guest.
Login or Sign up to edit.

Add an entry

Search:
 

Tools

Add a finding for this diagnosis

Add prevalence for this diagnosis

Switch to calculator mode to see positive predictive value

Switch to likelihood ratios

Sort findings by Tag

Sort findings by Differential Diagnosis

Jump To

Specific Findings

Poorly Diagnostic Findings

Ectopic Pregnancy: Sensitivity and Specificity

Introduction: See Pregnancy for beta-hCG diagnostic test accuracies.

[Edit Diagnosis] [Merge dx] [Add prevalence]

Tags: None. Tag this Diagnosis.

Prevalence

Population / CalculatorPrevalence Comments / Study / Link
Pregnancies 2% http://www.utdol.com/online/content/topic.do?topicKey=gen_gyne/6639
Women presenting to ED with first trimester bleeding, pain, or both 12% 6-16%

http://www.utdol.com/online/content/topic.do?topicKey=gen_gyne/6639

More, Edit...

The sensitivity and specificity of findings for Ectopic Pregnancy are listed below. See the left navigation bar to change the display.

Specific Findings

Finding SensitivitySpecificity Comments, Study
Trans-Vaginal Ultrasound Edit 74%100%

spec = 99.9%. Diagnostic criteria included sonographic evidence of an empty intrauterine cavity and adnexal mass and/or extrauterine gestational sac. For all patients where the diagnosis was "pregnancy of unknown location", ectopic pregnancy was later confirmed

Study: Hum Reprod. 2007 Nov;22(11):2824-8. PMID 17855406

Adnexal Mass Edit 9%96%

Study: Crochet, J. R., Bastian, L. A., & Chireau, M. V. (2013). Does This Woman Have an Ectopic Pregnancy? JAMA, 309(16), 1722. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.3914

Cervical motion tenderness Edit 45%91%

Study: Crochet, J. R., Bastian, L. A., & Chireau, M. V. (2013). Does This Woman Have an Ectopic Pregnancy? JAMA, 309(16), 1722. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.3914

Poorly Diagnostic Findings

Finding SensitivitySpecificity Comments, Study
Adnexal tenderness Edit 61%65%

Study: Crochet, J. R., Bastian, L. A., & Chireau, M. V. (2013). Does This Woman Have an Ectopic Pregnancy? JAMA, 309(16), 1722. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.3914